Capital loss: Madras, Kurnool, now Hyderabad

AP is unlucky with capitals. For the third time, he loses a capital. First it was Madras. Then, briefly, it was Kurnool that served as the state capital from 1953 to 1956, before being replaced by Hyderabad. But most devastating of all is the loss of Hyderabad.

The battle of Hyderabad was fierce, bitterly fought and prolonged. The plea to at least transform it into Union territory was rejected. The best that was offered was joint capital for 10 years – time to breathe to build new capital.

Many industrialists, educators and people from different backgrounds believe they have contributed enormously to the growth of Hyderabad as an international city. In fact, the entire Chennai-based Telugu film industry moved to Hyderabad in the 1980s.

Next are the hospitals, hotels, pharmaceutical, educational and real estate companies created by the entrepreneurs of Seemandhra. However, there is now a positive trend following the bifurcation, the inhabitants of the 13 districts have come to terms with reality and are now keen to build the new capital.

Stay in power

Andhras’ resilience and endurance cannot be understated. “I was a young teacher in the fifties in Kakinada when Potti Sriramulu sacrificed his life in the home of Bulusu Samba Murthy, a freedom fighter from Kakinada, Madras State at the time.

Jawaharlal Nehru reluctantly conceded the demand for a separate Andhra state, but in return we lost the capital – then Madras, ”recalled P Chiranjeevi Kumari, an 80-year-old educator.

Now, after almost 60 years, people are back to square one, she said. Today’s Hyderabad is no longer just a city built by the Nizam, but a modern metropolis developed by people from 23 districts. Therefore, losing Hyderabad is a big blow, she said.

G Sreenivasa Rao, a young engineer from Guntur, lamented that thousands of graduate students in the next two years will have to give up many opportunities. “Only rapid industry growth in the region can compensate for this loss,” he observed.

Yelamancheli Sivaji, a former member of parliament from Rajya Sabha, said it was a significant loss as resources from the coastal districts and Rayalseema were spent on establishing Hyderabad.

However, he sees this as a blessing in disguise. With no emotional integration over the years between Telangana and Seemandhra, the rational decision to branch off gives people the opportunity to build a capital and choose a path of decentralized growth, he said. “I want the capital to be moved as quickly as possible. Ten years is too long, ”he added.

Major industry captains such as Y Harischandra Prasad, JA Chowdhury, KS Rao, Jaydev Galla and Ayodhya Rami Reddy have expressed concern over the loss of Hyderabad.

But they have bounced back enough to formulate strategies to compensate for the loss by building infrastructure in Seemandhra.

Chowdhury, who has played a key role in accelerating the growth of IT in Hyderabad and has led most of the industry bodies in the sector, believes the loss is immense, but echoes a strong determination from a great number of motivated manufacturers.

These industrialists want to compensate for the loss by taking accelerated measures drawn by the tax incentives from which the State will benefit. There will be several centers where high-tech industries will be established. There are resources and manpower to make it happen.

CM Chandrababu Naidu expressed his dream of creating a Singapore at Seemandhra. The people delivered a verdict supporting their vision of building a modern state with an ultramodern capital.

The region, known for its entrepreneurial spirit, is committed to supporting it.

For now, it’s wait and watch.

Source link

Comments are closed.